GPT-4.1 vs Llama 4 Scout— Pricing & Token Cost Comparison
Side-by-side API pricing and tokenizer details for GPT-4.1 (OpenAI) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta).
Side-by-side pricing
| Feature | GPT-4.1 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $0.200 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $8.00 | $0.600 |
| Context caching | No | No |
| Batch API discount | 50% off | Not available |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 10M tokens |
| Tokenizer | o200k_base (tiktoken) | Heuristic (~chars/4) |
Real-world cost example
1,000 API requests per month, each with 500 input tokens and 200 output tokens (500K input + 200K output total).
GPT-4.1
$2.6000
Input: $1.0000 + Output: $1.6000
Llama 4 Scout
$0.2200
Input: $0.1000 + Output: $0.1200
Llama 4 Scout is 92% cheaper for this workload — saving $2.3800 per month at this volume.
Frequently asked questions
- Is GPT-4.1 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
- No, Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for the typical workload above. At $0.200/1M input and $0.600/1M output tokens, it costs $0.2200 versus $2.6000 for GPT-4.1 — a 92% difference.
- What is the context window of GPT-4.1 vs Llama 4 Scout?
- GPT-4.1 supports a 1M token context window. Llama 4 Scout supports a 10M token context window. A larger context window lets you include more text — documents, conversation history, or code — in a single API call.
- Do GPT-4.1 or Llama 4 Scout support context caching or batch discounts?
- GPT-4.1 does not support context caching. It offers a 50% Batch API discount. Llama 4 Scout does not support context caching. It does not offer a batch API discount.
Calculate costs for your actual prompt
Paste your prompt into the calculator and get exact token counts using each model's real tokenizer — all in your browser.
Open calculator